Advertisement

Drudge Retort: The Other Side of the News
Monday, May 06, 2024

Earth gained a record number of satellites -- nearly 3,000 -- last year, adding to the congestion around the planet, according to new data.

More

Comments

Admin's note: Participants in this discussion must follow the site's moderation policy. Profanity will be filtered. Abusive conduct is not allowed.

More from the article...

... Why it matters: Crowded orbits and collisions between satellites raise the risk of creating dangerous space debris and making parts of the planet's orbit unusable.

- - - "The industry has been saying space is becoming more congested for years, but now reality is setting in and the pressure is on to address the increasing risk in orbit," Melissa Quinn, general manager at Slingshot Aerospace said in a press release. Slingshot published its first State of Satellite Deployments & Orbital Operations report on Tuesday. ...


#1 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-06 01:23 AM | Reply

@#1 ... The industry has been saying ...

Oh, that ain't good.

That's just an another apparent way of saying... you are screwed.


#2 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-06 01:24 AM | Reply

Time to get Adam Quark on the case!

#3 | Posted by Nixon at 2024-05-06 09:37 AM | Reply

Tell Elmo to stop putting up all of those Starlink Sat's.

#4 | Posted by Whatsleft at 2024-05-06 05:07 PM | Reply

humanity is too stupid and greedy to
ever become a viable space-fairing race.

We will be lucky to get to and develop
a second planet (Mars), and maybe to the
asteroid belt, before likely becoming
extinct.

The speed of our decay (littering, entropy, waste, etc...),
outpaces our technological advances to reel it in.

#5 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-05-07 06:39 AM | Reply

blocking the sun probably causing climate change glad I'll be dead before it makes a difference to ME... hmmm wonder what Jayzus would do?

#6 | Posted by RightisTrite at 2024-05-07 06:47 AM | Reply

Renewable resources aren't much of a problem, you can grow/make new more of it. However non-renewable is a different matter, once gone, they don't come back. We face a problem among the many. Those non-renewables are among our most valuable and often irreplaceable elements and materials. They are also highly valued for the use in space. We have sort of deadlines, one for climate change and another for actually making it out of LEO. Some of those non-renewables are in the asteroids. The question is, can we get to them to mine them before we run out of those non-renewables, forever locking us on to this planet, waiting for the inevitable killer asteroid?

Putting up barriers to that effort isn't helping. Musk's trashing LEO should be cause to call him to remove his orbital trash before one of the sinks his attempt to send people to Mars. Already the ISS has to often change to get out of the way of traveling debris, left behind by various countries such as Russia testing the destroying of satellites or China, who seems not to care at all. I guess it will take one of these launches going off course and impacting a major city to get the attention of the world to it's hazards, beyond those actually interested in it today. It's a sad comment on money being more important than survival.

#7 | Posted by BBQ at 2024-05-07 11:48 AM | Reply

"forever locking us on to this planet"

We ain't goin' nowhere, buddy. Light speed is unattainable, and a few hundred years will get us to the exact middle of nowhere.

#8 | Posted by LegallyYourDead at 2024-05-08 03:32 PM | Reply

Mankind needs time, 300 years at least, to solve some of our more pressing problems, and to develop new technologies. Climate change, plastics, and overpopulation amongst the foremost of our problems, will all need addressing. And the threat of the U.S. collapsing and fascism and strong men coming to power are also very real threats, indeed likely eventual certainties.

Overpopulation (outside of Africa) looks to be largely on the way to healing itself, what with aging populations, the high cost of living, and other factors such as (the relic of China's 'one child policy') stemming the worst of future runaway population growth scenarios.

Climate change is perhaps the most pressing of our problems, followed closely by our increased rate of poisoning our planet. Both of which will put mankind in a race with himself and his own destructive tendencies.

Even as I read good news today, the World passed a key threshold of generating 30% of its total energy supplied by Green Energy Sources (in the Guardian today), I also read depressing news that 73% of environmental scientists now believe the earth won't just pass 1.5C of total warming in the next year or so, but will likely see 2.5C of warming by 2040 or 2050, which would have terrible effects on the earth and its climate.

We need time. We need technological breakthroughs that buy us more of it, so that we can ramp up the changes we need in time to avert the unthinkable from happening. But this really is the question. Can we act fast enough? Will we act in time to save ourselves and pur children's futures?

That remains to be seen.

#9 | Posted by earthmuse at 2024-05-08 07:50 PM | Reply

@#9 ... Climate change is perhaps the most pressing of our problems ...

In the shorter-term time frame, I'd say it is one of our more pressing problems, not necessarily the most pressing.

My long-term concern about climate change is how it is affecting agriculture food production around the world.


Short-term, I have other, more pressing, concerns.


#10 | Posted by LampLighter at 2024-05-08 08:08 PM | Reply

Comments are closed for this entry.

Home | Breaking News | Comments | User Blogs | Stats | Back Page | RSS Feed | RSS Spec | DMCA Compliance | Privacy | Copyright 2024 World Readable

Drudge Retort